<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>NHibernate</title>
        <link>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/category/2340.aspx</link>
        <description>NHibernate</description>
        <language>it-IT</language>
        <copyright>Tommaso Caldarola</copyright>
        <generator>Subtext Version 2.1.0.5</generator>
        <item>
            <title>Remoting NHibernate</title>
            <link>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/archive/2008/05/27/92828.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;A questo indirizzo &lt;a title="http://code.google.com/p/remoting-nhibernate" href="http://code.google.com/p/remoting-nhibernate"&gt;http://code.google.com/p/remoting-nhibernate&lt;/a&gt; ho caricato un progetto / prototipo che dimostra come usare &lt;a href="http://www.hibernate.org/343.html" target="_blank"&gt;NHibernate&lt;/a&gt; in ambiente 3-tier (cioè con layer fisici separati) e con lazy-loading abilitato.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Il progetto a livello architetturale è un estratto di un progetto reale al quale ho potato tutte le feature che caratterizzano un qualsiasi progetto (logging, gestione errori, ecc.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/aggbug/92828.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Tommaso Caldarola</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/archive/2008/05/27/92828.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:33:26 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/comments/92828.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/archive/2008/05/27/92828.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/comments/commentRss/92828.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/services/trackbacks/92828.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NHibernate: one-to-one (hanno senso?)</title>
            <link>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/archive/2006/11/07/54076.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Dopo svariati mesi di utilizzo mi sto rendendo conto che le one-to-one rappresentano un altro caso da gestire ma che possono essere benissimo gestite come one-to-many mascherate e ponendo nell'Object Model una proprietà che&amp;nbsp;restituisca&amp;nbsp;la prima riga, se presente.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/aggbug/54076.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Tommaso Caldarola</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/archive/2006/11/07/54076.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/comments/54076.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/archive/2006/11/07/54076.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/comments/commentRss/54076.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://blogs.ugidotnet.org/tomblog/services/trackbacks/54076.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>